Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
J Radiol Prot ; 44(2)2024 Apr 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38569480

RESUMEN

The number of healthcare workers occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation (IR) is increasing every year. As health effects from exposure to low doses IR have been reported, radiation protection (RP) in the context of occupational activities is a major concern. This study aims to assess the compliance of healthcare workers with RP policies, according to their registered cumulative dose, profession, and perception of radiation self-exposure and associated risk. Every healthcare worker from one of the participating hospitals in France with at least one dosimetric record for each year 2009, 2014, and 2019 in the SISERI registry was included and invited to complete an online questionnaire including information on the worker's occupational exposure, perception of IR-exposure risk and RP general knowledge. Hp(10) doses were provided by the SISERI system. Multivariate logistic regressions were used. Dosimeter wearing and RP practices compliance were strongly associated with 'feeling of being IR-exposed' (OR = 3.69, CI95% 2.04-6.66; OR = 4.60, CI95% 2.28-9.30, respectively). However, none of these factors was associated with RP training courses attendance. The main reason given for non-compliance is unsuitability or insufficient numbers of RP devices. This study provided useful information for RP policies. Making exposed workers aware of their own IR-exposure seems to be a key element to address in RP training courses. This type of questionnaire should be introduced into larger epidemiological studies. Dosimeter wearing and RP practices compliance are associated to feeling being IR-exposed. RP training courses should reinforce workers' awareness of their exposure to IR.


Asunto(s)
Exposición Profesional , Protección Radiológica , Humanos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Personal de Salud , Radiometría , Radiación Ionizante , Hospitales , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Exposición Profesional/análisis
2.
Eur Radiol ; 33(8): 5675-5684, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36930262

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Health workers exposed to ionizing radiation account for + 50% of workers exposed to man-made radiation in France. Over the last decade, the use of radiation in medicine has increased due to the introduction of new practices. The EXposition des Professionnels de santE aux RayonnemenTs ioniSants study aims to evaluate and characterize the trends in radiation exposure of health workers in France between 2009 and 2019. METHODS: This retrospective study includes all health workers with at least one dosimetric record in the system for occupational dosimetry registration (Système d'information de la surveillance de l'exposition aux rayonnements ionisants) database for each of the years 2009, 2014, and 2019, in the hospitals included in the study. Individual external doses and socio-professional data were collected. Statistical analyses include descriptions, graphs, and logistic regressions. RESULTS: A total of 1457 workers were included (mean age: 39.8 years, 59% women). The average exposure significantly decreased between 2009 and 2019 (-0.008 mSv/year, p < 0.05). There were large discrepancies in trends according to professions, departments, hospitals, and gender. Over the 10-year study period, radiologic technologists and physicians were the most exposed (0.15 mSv (95%CI 0.14-0.16) and 0.13 mSv (0.06-0.21), respectively), but their exposure tended to decrease. Workers in nuclear medicine departments had the highest radiation exposure (0.36 mSv (0.33-0.39)), which remained stable over time. Thirty-eight percent of recorded doses were nonzero in 2009, decreasing to 20% in 2019. CONCLUSIONS: This study allowed to identify physicians and radiologic technologists in nuclear medicine departments as the most exposed medical workers in France, and to show an overall decrease trend in radiation exposure. This should be instructive for radiation monitoring and safety of exposed medical workers. KEY POINTS: • Radiation exposure of healthcare workers in most medical departments has steadily decreased between 2009 and 2019 in several French hospitals. • The number of zero doses consistently increased during the study period. • Workers in nuclear medicine departments are the most exposed, especially radiologic technologists and physicians.


Asunto(s)
Exposición Profesional , Exposición a la Radiación , Monitoreo de Radiación , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Masculino , Dosis de Radiación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Radiación Ionizante , Cuerpo Médico
3.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 28(32): 43190-43216, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34165744

RESUMEN

Incidence rates of hematological malignancies have been constantly increasing over the past 40 years. In parallel, an expanding use of agricultural pesticides has been observed. Only a limited number of studies investigated the link between hematological malignancies risk and passive environmental residential exposure to agricultural pesticides in the general population. The purpose of our review was to summarize the current state of knowledge on that question. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed and Scopus databases. We built a scoring scale to appraise relevance of each selected articles. We included 23 publications: 13 ecological studies, 9 case-control studies and a cohort study. Positive associations were reported between hematological malignancies and individual pesticides, pesticide groups, all pesticides without distinction, or some crop types. Relevance score was highly various across studies regardless of their design. Children studies were the majority and had overall higher relevance scores. The effect of passive environmental residential exposure to agricultural pesticides on hematological malignancies risk is suggested by the literature. The main limitation of the literature available is the high heterogeneity across studies, especially in terms of exposure assessment approach. Further studies with high methodological relevance should be conducted.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Plaguicidas , Agricultura , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis , Neoplasias Hematológicas/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Hematológicas/epidemiología , Humanos , Plaguicidas/efectos adversos , Plaguicidas/análisis
4.
Int J Cancer ; 144(12): 2954-2963, 2019 06 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30537057

RESUMEN

Although medical ionizing radiation (IR) has clear clinical benefits, it is an established carcinogen. Our study estimates the number of new cancer cases in France in 2015 attributable to IR exposure from medical procedures. Exposures from external (X-rays, CT scans, interventional radiology) and internal (nuclear medicine) sources were considered. We used 2007 national frequencies of diagnostic examinations by sex and age to estimate the lifetime organ dose exposure adjusted for changes in the use of such procedures over time. The Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII risk models were used to estimate the corresponding excess cancer risk, assuming an average latency period of 10 years. Additionally, we used cancer incidence data from the French Cancer Registries Network. Of the 346,000 estimated new cancer cases in adults in France in 2015, 2300 cases (940 among men and 1360 among women) were attributable to diagnostic IR, representing 0.7% of all new cancer cases (0.5% for men and 0.9% for women). The leading cancers attributable to medical IR were female breast (n = 560 cases), lung (n = 500 cases) and colon (n = 290 cases) cancers. Compared to other risk factors, the contribution of medical IR to the cancer burden is small, and the benefits largely outweigh its harms. However, some of these IR-associated cancer cases may be preventable through dose optimization of and enhanced justification for diagnostic examinations.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/epidemiología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Diagnóstico por Imagen/efectos adversos , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dosis de Radiación , Exposición a la Radiación , Radiación Ionizante , Riesgo , Factores Sexuales
5.
Radiat Environ Biophys ; 57(3): 205-214, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29737422

RESUMEN

Radon is the second leading cause of lung cancer after smoking. Since the previous quantitative risk assessment of indoor radon conducted in France, input data have changed such as, estimates of indoor radon concentrations, lung cancer rates and the prevalence of tobacco consumption. The aim of this work was to update the risk assessment of lung cancer mortality attributable to indoor radon in France using recent risk models and data, improving the consideration of smoking, and providing results at a fine geographical scale. The data used were population data (2012), vital statistics on death from lung cancer (2008-2012), domestic radon exposure from a recent database that combines measurement results of indoor radon concentration and the geogenic radon potential map for France (2015), and smoking prevalence (2010). The risk model used was derived from a European epidemiological study, considering that lung cancer risk increased by 16% per 100 becquerels per cubic meter (Bq/m3) indoor radon concentration. The estimated number of lung cancer deaths attributable to indoor radon exposure is about 3000 (1000; 5000), which corresponds to about 10% of all lung cancer deaths each year in France. About 33% of lung cancer deaths attributable to radon are due to exposure levels above 100 Bq/m3. Considering the combined effect of tobacco and radon, the study shows that 75% of estimated radon-attributable lung cancer deaths occur among current smokers, 20% among ex-smokers and 5% among never-smokers. It is concluded that the results of this study, which are based on precise estimates of indoor radon concentrations at finest geographical scale, can serve as a basis for defining French policy against radon risk.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Radiactivos del Aire/efectos adversos , Vivienda , Radón/efectos adversos , Adulto , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Masculino , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/epidemiología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/mortalidad , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Fumar/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven
6.
Int J Cancer ; 142(5): 899-909, 2018 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29055029

RESUMEN

Nuclear power plants (NPPs) release toxic emissions into the environment that may affect neighboring populations. This ecologic study was designed to investigate the possibility of an excess incidence of cancer in the vicinity of French NPPs by examining the incidence by municipality of 12 types of cancer in the population aged 15 years and older during the 1995-2011 period. Population exposure to pollution was estimated on the basis of distance from towns of residence to the NPP. Using regression models, we assessed the risk of cancer in a 20-km zone around NPPs and observed an excess incidence of bladder cancer (Relative Risk (RR), 95% Credibility Interval (95% CI)) in men and women (RRmen = 1.08; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.17 and RRwomen = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.39). Women living within the 20-km proximity areas had a significantly reduced risk of thyroid cancer (RRwomen = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.77, 0.96). No excess risk of hematologic malignancies in either sex was seen. The higher than expected incidence of bladder cancer may be due to an excess incidence localized around the Flamanville NPP and the nearby La Hague nuclear waste treatment center, which is a source of chemical contaminants, many (including arsenic) of them known risk factors for bladder cancer. Differences in medical practices could explain the reduced risk of thyroid cancer. In this first study of adults living near NPPs in France, cancer incidence is significantly higher than in the references populations for one of the cancer types studied: bladder cancer.


Asunto(s)
Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/epidemiología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Plantas de Energía Nuclear , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo
7.
Radiat Res ; 177(3): 288-97, 2012 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22206233

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to assess the risk of lung cancer death associated with cumulative lung doses from exposure to α-particle emitters, including radon gas, radon short-lived progeny, and long-lived radionuclides, and to external γ rays among French uranium miners. The French "post-55" sub-cohort included 3,377 uranium miners hired from 1956, followed up through the end of 1999, and contributing to 89,405 person-years. Lung doses were calculated with the ICRP Human Respiratory Tract Model (Publication 66) for 3,271 exposed miners. The mean "absorbed lung dose" due to α-particle radiation was 78 mGy, and that due to the contribution from other types of radiation (γ and ß-particle radiation) was 56 mGy. Radon short-lived progeny accounted for 97% of the α-particle absorbed dose. Out of the 627 deaths, the cause of death was identified for 97.4%, and 66 cases were due to lung cancer. A significant excess relative risk (ERR) of lung cancer death was associated with the total absorbed lung dose (ERR/Gy = 2.94, 95% CI 0.80, 7.53) and the α-particle absorbed dose (4.48, 95% CI 1.27, 10.89). Assuming a value of 20 for the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of α particles for lung cancer induction, the ERR/Gy-Eq for the total weighted lung dose was 0.22 (95% CI: 0.06, 0.53).


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Pulmón/efectos de la radiación , Minería , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/mortalidad , Dosis de Radiación , Uranio/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Partículas alfa/efectos adversos , Partículas beta/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Estudios de Seguimiento , Francia/epidemiología , Rayos gamma/efectos adversos , Humanos , Transferencia Lineal de Energía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
8.
Radiat Res ; 176(6): 796-806, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21936607

RESUMEN

The adverse health effects of radon on uranium miners, especially on their lungs, are well documented, but few studies have considered the effects of other radiation exposures. This study examined the mortality risks associated with exposure to radon, external γ rays and long-lived radionuclides (LLR) in the French "post-55" sub-cohort, which includes uranium miners first employed between 1956 and 1990 for whom all three types of exposure were assessed individually. Exposure-risk relationships were estimated with linear excess relative risk models and a 5-year lag time. The post-55 sub-cohort includes 3377 miners, contributing 89,405 person-years, followed up through the end of 1999 with a mean follow-up of 26.5 years. Mean cumulative exposure was 17.8 WLM for radon, 54.7 mSv for γ rays, and 1,632 Bq.m(-3).h for LLR. Among the 611 deaths observed, 66 were due to lung cancer. Annual individual exposures were significantly correlated. Increased mortality was observed for lung cancer (SMR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.65) and for brain and central nervous system (CNS) cancer (SMR = 2.00; 95% CI: 1.09, 3.35). Cumulative exposure to radon, γ rays and LLR was associated only with a significant risk of lung cancer. These new results could suggest an association between lung cancer and exposure to γ rays and LLR. They must nonetheless be interpreted with caution because of the correlation between the types of exposure. The calculation of organ doses received by each of these exposures would reduce the collinearity.


Asunto(s)
Rayos gamma/efectos adversos , Minería , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/mortalidad , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Radioisótopos/efectos adversos , Radón/efectos adversos , Uranio/efectos adversos , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Francia/epidemiología , Semivida , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Masculino , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Radioisótopos/química , Riesgo , Adulto Joven
9.
Scand J Work Environ Health ; 36(5): 373-83, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20101380

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The few studies examining the risk of circulatory system diseases (CSD) associated with ionizing radiation have reported inconsistent results. Radon, a known pulmonary carcinogen, emits ionizing radiation. The aim of this study was to examine CSD mortality in a French cohort of uranium miners and evaluate the plausibility of an association with radon exposure. METHODS: The cohort included men employed as uranium miners for >/=1 year between 1946-1990. We obtained vital status and cause of death from national registers and reconstructed radon exposure for each year. Exposure--risk relations were estimated with a linear excess relative risk (ERR) model using a 5-year lag time. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 5086 miners, followed up for a mean duration of 30.1 years. The average cumulative exposure of the radon-exposed miners was 36.6 working level months (WLM). A total of 1411 deaths were observed, including 319 deaths due to CSD. No excess risk was found for this overall cause of death. A significant positive trend was observed between deaths from cerebrovascular diseases (CeVD) and cumulative radon exposure, together with a significant ERR per 100 WLM [ERR per 100 WLM 0.49, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.07-1.23)]. Hard physical activity was identified as a potential modifying factor of the exposure-risk relation. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time in a cohort of uranium miners, our results suggest an association between CeVD mortality and cumulative radon exposure. Due to a lack of data, which limited our ability to assess possible confounding by cardiovascular risk factors, these findings should be interpreted with caution.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Minería , Enfermedades Profesionales/mortalidad , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Radón/toxicidad , Uranio/toxicidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Intervalos de Confianza , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Estadísticos , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Riesgo , Medición de Riesgo
10.
Health Phys ; 97(6): 613-21, 2009 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19901596

RESUMEN

This case-control study nested in the French cohort of uranium miners provides an opportunity to take account of silicosis and smoking in the assessment of the relation between radon and lung cancer. The study includes 100 miners who died of lung cancer and 500 matched controls born within the same period of birth and of the same age at the time of death of the matching case. Data on radon exposure are obtained from individual monitoring of the miners, and data on smoking come from medical records and interviews. To identify cases of silicosis among the 600 miners surveyed, appraisals carried out as part of the compensation process for occupational diseases are used. Statistical analyses are based on a conditional logistic regression, and the linear model for excess relative risk was used to model the risk of death due to lung cancer according to cumulative radon exposure. The percentage of missing data on silicotic status is less than 20%. The study reveals a significant association between the relative risk of lung cancer and silicosis (ORsilicosis = 3.6; 95% CI: 1.4-8.9), and the relation between radon and lung cancer persists after adjusting for smoking and silicotic status (ERRradon per WLM = 1.0%; 95% CI: 0.1-3.5%). Radon, cigarette smoking and silicotic status appear to be three factors that each have a specific effect on the risk of lung cancer. This study reminds us of the complexity involved in assessing occupational risks in the case of multiple sources of exposure.


Asunto(s)
Carga Corporal (Radioterapia) , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Minería/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Radón/análisis , Silicosis/epidemiología , Fumar/epidemiología , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Uranio
11.
Radiat Environ Biophys ; 48(1): 1-9, 2009 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18949479

RESUMEN

Radon is classified as a known pulmonary carcinogen in humans. A better understanding of the effects of low exposure and time-dependent factors, modifying the lung cancer risk is of continued interest. We present analyses of the exposure-risk relationship in the French cohort of uranium miners updated until 1999 and including five additional years of follow-up. These new analyses provide a better opportunity to look at low radon exposures with longer follow-up intervals, and allow consideration of new modifying factors, such as physical activity, mine location and job type. The cohort includes 5,086 miners, and 159 lung cancer deaths have been observed among these over a follow-up of more than 30 years. The exposure-risk relationship was estimated using excess relative risk models, which allow investigation of several modifying factors such as period of exposure, time since exposure, age at exposure, duration of exposure, exposure rate, job type, mine type and physical activity. The analysis confirms the association between radon exposure and lung cancer risk (ERR per 100 WLM = 0.58, P < 0.01). Period of exposure and physical activity appear as major modifying factors. Higher risks are observed for hard physical activity works. The effect of hard physical activity persists when the period of exposure is taken into account (ERR per 100 WLM = 2.95, P < 0.01).


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Minería , Exposición Profesional , Radón/efectos adversos , Uranio/efectos adversos , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios de Seguimiento , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...